This is Amanda here, blogging at the end of my second full week as a staff member in the national office! I’m so excited and honored to be LSRJ’s first-ever Fellow, and I wanted to take this opportunity to introduce myself and discuss a troubling and misleading aspect of the last presidential debate. On Wednesday, Senator John McCain referred to the “pro-abortion movement” twice, saying in one instance that the “extreme pro-abortion position” is to stretch the “health” (complete with air-quotes!) of the mother to “mean almost anything.”

After the debate ended I found myself wondering, what is this so-called “pro-abortion movement”? Who are its leaders? What are their goals? Where is the website? Does this movement share any values or ideals with the movement I identify with, the reproductive justice movement? I asked my friends, coworkers, and colleagues in the movement. But strangely, no one had any names of organizations to look up, contacts to call, or websites to visit.

Of course, I’m being facetious. There is no pro-abortion movement. The movement that I am a part of “envisons the complete physical, mental, and spiritual well-being of women and girls.” LSRJ believes that reproductive justice will be achieved when all people and communities have access to the information, resources, and support they need to attain sexual and reproductive self-determination. Reproductive justice extends beyond the false pro-life/pro-choice dichotomy that has permeated the culture wars surrounding the debate about reproductive health services. As such, reproductive justice is a movement that does not consider abortion to be “the issue” of prime importance, but also does not believe it is constructive to send a message that it is “always a tragic situation,” as Senator Obama lamented in the last debate. Reproductive justice demands that voices that have historically been stifled be heard; that both adults and minors have the information and resources they need to achieve reproductive and bodily autonomy; that prisoners have access to adequate reproductive health services and an opportunity to keep their families intact. That’s why reproductive justice is just as much about challenging the injustices in Ledbetter as it is about challenging the injustices in Carhart. After all, a worker’s ability to succeed in the workplace is intimately linked to his or her ability to care for their family—and reproductive justice cannot be achieved unless and until all people are treated equally in the workplace, and courts enforce civil rights laws enacted to protect them from illegal pay discrimination.

Senator McCain attempted to rename a movement by calling it something it’s not. Our movement will not stand for this artificial and misleading invention. Our movement knows that women’s “health” does not belong in air quotes, and that abortion is not the defining aspect of achieving reproductive justice. I am eager to work with LSRJ and our allies in the next year to continue to challenge falsehoods like these while building additional capacity, vision, and leadership in the reproductive justice movement.

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 19th, 2008 at 2:06 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.